
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Department of Energy Office of Inspector General report released July 2, 2025, blasts the Office of Nuclear Energy for steering a sole-source High Assay Low Enriched Uranium (HALEU) contract to American Centrifuge Operating, LLC (a Centrus subsidiary), despite clear procurement rules and the company’s shaky finances (DOE-OIG-25-25).
The audit found that Nuclear Energy “bypassed contracting rules outlined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation” and used a pre-award Memorandum of Understanding to lock in Centrus as the only viable provider of the AC-100M centrifuge cascade needed for HALEU production (DOE-OIG-25-25, p. 2).
Key findings of the report include:
- Restricted Competition: The January 2019 Notice of Intent and the May 2019 Justification for Other Than Full and Open Competition contained highly restrictive language that “limited competition” to ACO alone (DOE-OIG-25-25, p. 4).
- Premature MOU: A September 2018 MOU—signed before any public solicitation—committed Centrus to rescind its NRC license amendment request and extend its Piketon facility lease, actions it likely would not have taken “given its financial situation” absent the promise of a contract (DOE-OIG-25-25, pp. 2–3).
- Financial Instability: At award time in May 2019, Centrus’s total debt “was significantly greater than its total assets,” with negative equity and an inability “to pay short-term obligations from assets readily convertible to cash” (DOE-OIG-25-25, p. 5).
Under the Competition in Contracting Act, federal procurements must be competed “as full and open,” with written justification required for any sole-source award. The report concludes that Nuclear Energy skirted these requirements, undermining transparency and potentially costing taxpayers more for less capable competition (DOE-OIG-25-25, p. 6).
“This MOU process limited competition and clearly indicated Nuclear Energy’s intention to award a HALEU contract to Centrus,” the audit states, warning that such actions are “not in the Government’s best interest” (DOE-OIG-25-25, p. 4).
Despite red flags, the Department awarded the contract on May 31, 2019, reduced ACO’s required cost share from 50 percent to 20 percent, and ignored a March 2019 financial desk review that “found Centrus did not have adequate financial resources to fulfill the contract” (DOE-OIG-25-25, pp. 5–6).
The report stops short of formal recommendations—citing the six-year lapse since award—but urges Nuclear Energy to apply its findings “during future procurements, paying particular attention to potential sole source awards” (DOE-OIG-25-25, p. 6).
Advocates for environmental and nuclear watchdog groups warn the audit confirms long-standing concerns: that Centrus’s troubled Chapter 11 history, combined with a tightly controlled procurement process, reflects “acquisition practices that are neither fair nor transparent” and may leave the nation dependent on a single, financially unstable supplier for HALEU fuel.
Centrus Energy Corp History
1940s
Calutron – The U.S. government began enriching uranium for defense purposes.
1960s
The government began commercial sales of enriched uranium to the global nuclear power industry, promoting peaceful use of nuclear power and nonproliferation.
1970s
The Nixon administration proposed privatizing the government’s uranium enrichment business.
1992
Energy Policy Act created the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC), a government corporation spun out of DOE’s Uranium Enrichment Enterprise, with a plan to fully privatize.
July 1993
USEC began operations as a government corporation, continuing the U.S. government’s role as the primary supplier of low-enriched uranium.
1998
Initial public offering sold USEC Inc. to investors. Shares began trading on the New York Stock Exchange and generated over $3 billion for the U.S. Treasury.
1993–2013
“Megatons to Megawatts” downblending program turned former Soviet warhead material into reactor fuel, providing 10% of U.S. electricity and eliminating 20,000 warheads worth of weapons-grade uranium.
2013
The last Cold War–era enrichment plant was shut down for economic reasons.
2014
After Chapter 11 restructuring, the company re-emerged as Centrus Energy Corp with a stronger balance sheet and new board of directors.
2014–2016
Centrus demonstrated low-enriched uranium (LEU) production at the American Centrifuge Plant in Piketon, Ohio.
Late 2023
Under a DOE contract, Centrus began first-of-a-kind production of High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU), marking the first U.S. technology–based enrichment production since 1954.
Today & Beyond
Centrus continues supplying low-enriched uranium from multiple suppliers under long-term contracts.
Centrus Energy Corp Lawsuits
McGlone et al. v. Centrus Energy Corp. et al.
Docket No. 2:19-cv-02196
- Filed: May 26, 2019
- Plaintiffs: Ursula & Jason McGlone; Julia Dunham & minor children
- Claims: Price-Anderson Act, CERCLA, negligence, trespass, nuisance, strict liability, injunctive relief, medical monitoring, class certification
- Allegations: Decades of airborne radionuclide emissions from Portsmouth site contaminated off-site soils, homes, and a middle school (shut down May 2019)
- Status: Survived motions to dismiss (Jan 2020); active fact discovery & expert disclosures
Walburn et al. v. Centrus Energy Corp. et al.
Docket No. 2:20-cv-04621
- Filed: November 9, 2020
- Plaintiffs: Residents, workers & families near Portsmouth plant (class action)
- Claims: Personal injury & property damage from alleged radioactive/chemical releases
- Status: Discovery phase; plaintiffs pursuing class certification
Lykins v. Centrus Energy Corp. et al.
Docket No. 1:22-cv-00328 → 2:22-cv-02440
- Filed: June 8, 2022 (transferred June 10, 2022)
- Plaintiff: Brad Allen Lykins
- Claim: Personal injury from alleged radiological exposure at PORTS
- Status: Answer filed; discovery ongoing
Shaw v. Centrus Energy Corp. et al.
Docket No. 2:23-cv-03933
- Filed: November 27, 2023
- Plaintiff: Joshua Shaw
- Claim: Personal injury tied to alleged radionuclide exposure around Portsmouth site
- Status: Initial pleadings & case-management conference completed; discovery scheduled
Pike County Residents v. U.S. DOE & Centrus
Ohio State Courts, 2021
- Plaintiffs: Families & community groups in Pike County, OH
- Defendants: U.S. Department of Energy & Centrus
- Claims: Nuisance, trespass, negligence, public nuisance over post-shutdown contamination
- Status: Consolidated in Pike County Common Pleas; discovery & expert reports underway

Add comment
Comments